Fix some warnings in developer builds (#3247)

* Fix some warnings in developer builds

* Switch approach to Winline flag
This commit is contained in:
jhendersonHDF
2023-07-18 04:27:07 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 919ce7adc2
commit aab497a631
22 changed files with 250 additions and 269 deletions
-30
View File
@@ -369,36 +369,6 @@ test_multi_chunk_io_addrmap_issue(void)
* I/O with collective metadata reads enabled doesn't cause issues due to
* collective metadata reads being made only by process 0 in H5D__sort_chunk().
*
* NOTE: Due to the way that the threshold value which pertains to this test
* is currently calculated within HDF5, the following two conditions must be
* true to trigger the issue:
*
* Condition 1: A certain threshold ratio must be met in order to have HDF5
* obtain all chunk addresses collectively inside H5D__sort_chunk(). This is
* given by the following:
*
* (sum_chunk * 100) / (dataset_nchunks * mpi_size) >= 30%
*
* where:
* * `sum_chunk` is the combined sum of the number of chunks selected in
* the dataset by all ranks (chunks selected by more than one rank count
* individually toward the sum for each rank selecting that chunk)
* * `dataset_nchunks` is the number of chunks in the dataset (selected
* or not)
* * `mpi_size` is the size of the MPI Communicator
*
* Condition 2: `sum_chunk` divided by `mpi_size` must exceed or equal a certain
* threshold (as of this writing, 10000).
*
* To satisfy both these conditions, we #define a macro,
* LINK_CHUNK_IO_SORT_CHUNK_ISSUE_COLL_THRESH_NUM, which corresponds to the
* value of the H5D_ALL_CHUNK_ADDR_THRES_COL_NUM macro in H5Dmpio.c (the
* 10000 threshold from condition 2). We then create a dataset of that many
* chunks and have each MPI rank write to and read from a piece of every single
* chunk in the dataset. This ensures chunk utilization is the max possible
* and exceeds our 30% target ratio, while always exactly matching the numeric
* chunk threshold value of condition 2.
*
* Failure in this test may either cause a hang, or, due to how the MPI calls
* pertaining to this issue might mistakenly match up, may cause an MPI error
* message similar to: