# Identical sub-expressions to the left and to the right of 'foo' operator.
//-V::501
# Pointer to local variable 'X' is stored outside the scope of this variable. Such a pointer will become invalid.
//-V::506
# The 'new type(n)' pattern was detected. Probably meant: 'new type[n]'.
//-V::508
# The 'x' variable is assigned values twice successively. Perhaps this is a mistake.
//-V::519
# Constant value is represented by an octal form.
//-V::536
# Iterators are passed as arguments to 'Foo' function. Consider inspecting the expression.
//-V::539
# Expression is always true/false.
//-V::547
# Array underrun/overrun is possible.
//-V::557
# Part of conditional expression is always true/false.
//-V::560
# It is suspicious that the argument of sizeof() operator is the expression.
//-V::568
# Variable is assigned to itself.
//-V::570
# Recurring check. This condition was already verified in previous line.
//-V::571
# Function receives suspicious argument.
//-V::575
# Conditional expressions of 'if' statements located next to each other are identical.
//-V::581
# The 'Foo' function is called twice to deallocate the same resource.
//-V::586
# Expression is enclosed by parentheses twice: ((expression)). One pair of parentheses is unnecessary or typo is present.
//-V::592
# Pointer was used before its check for nullptr. Check lines: N1, N2.
//-V::595
# Possible division or mod by zero.
//-V::609
# Condition of a loop is always true/false.
//-V::654
# Possible meaningless check for null, as memory was allocated using 'new' operator. Memory allocation will lead to an exception.
//-V::668
# An object is used as an argument to its own method.
//-V::678
# Pattern A || (A && ...) was detected. The expression is excessive or contains a logical error.
//-V::686
# The class implements a copy constructor/operator=, but lacks the operator=/copy constructor.
//-V::690
# Excessive check can be simplified. The '||' operator is surrounded by opposite expressions 'x' and '!x'.
//-V::728
# Not all members of a class are initialized inside the constructor.
//-V::730
# Suspicious access to element of '...' array by a constant index inside a loop.
//-V::767
# The pointer in the expression equals nullptr. The resulting value is meaningless and should not be used.
//-V::769
# Two similar code fragments were found.
//-V::778
# Value of a variable is checked after it is used. Possible error in program's logic. Check lines: N1, N2.
//-V::781
# Variable is assigned but not used by the end of the function.
//-V::1001
# Pointer was used unsafely after its check for nullptr.
//-V::1004
# Value from the uninitialized optional is used. It may be an error.
//-V::1007
# The value is out of range of enum values. This causes unspecified or undefined behavior.
//-V::1016
# A pointer without owner is added to the container by the 'emplace_back' method. A memory leak will occur in case of an exception.
//-V::1023
# Possible overflow. Consider casting operands, not the result.
//-V::1028
# Variable is used after it is moved.
//-V::1030
# Two or more case-branches perform the same actions.
//-V::1037
# This file is marked with copyleft license, which requires you to open the derived source code.
//-V::1042
# Loop break conditions do not depend on the number of iterations.
//-V::1044
# Variable 'foo' was assigned the same value.
//-V::1048
# It is possible that an assigned variable should be checked in the next condition. Consider checking for typos.
//-V::1051
# Calling the 'foo' virtual function in the constructor/destructor may lead to unexpected result at runtime.
//-V::1053
# Return value is not always used. Consider inspecting the 'foo' function.
//-V::1071
# Conditional initialization inside the constructor may leave some members uninitialized.
//-V::1077
# Waiting on condition variable without predicate. A thread can wait indefinitely or experience a spurious wake-up.
//-V::1089
# The 'emplace' / 'insert' function call contains potentially dangerous move operation. Moved object can be destroyed even if there is no insertion.
//-V::1098
# Preprocessing directive is present within a macro argument. This leads to undefined behavior.
//-V::1119